A homegrown credit rating agency will be required to complement India’s growth ambitions and policy independence.
Ability to leverage a large pool of industry connections for Business Development
India specific models to be built under the Indian context with deep sectoral expertise and experience
Integrated rating models using macro-economic variables and stress testing for shorter lead times
ACER is promoted by a leading public sector bank and led by former senior officials of banks, SEBI, RBI, and the government of India
ACER will build models with local context and deep regional expertise as an improvement over current models that over-generalize certain sectors
ACER aims to be a market leader in facilitating highly compliant operations that are orchestrated through high tech internal digital tools.
ACER will be powered by the latest AI frameworks, enabling real-time monitoring & updates and stronger predictive analytics than traditional credit rating agency models
Ex-CEO IBA, Ex-MD & CEO PNB
Ex-Chairman IBBI, Ex-SEBI Whole Time Member
NPCI Chairman, Ex-ED, RBI
Ex-CGA, Ministry of Finance
Ex-GM CBoI
Issuer Approaches ACER for rating
2Issuer signs rating agreement specifying amount, instruments, and fee
3ACER gathers detailed information such as financial statements, business plans, market position, industry risks, management quality
Analysts meet with senior management of the company to discuss company's strategy, corporate governance, risk management practices, and future outlook
5The collected information is analyzed to assess the company's creditworthiness. Proprietary models and AI are extensively leveraged.
6The analysis is reviewed by a rating committee; a credit rating is assigned based on rating criteria
Issuer Approaches ACER for rating
8The rating is initially communicated to the issuer to seek any further info that might influence rating; the rating is then published with the rationale behind it
9If the issuer disagrees with the rating, it can appeal to ACER by providing additional information or clarification to address the reasons for the rating decision
# | Safety Level | Long Term Securities | Long Term Structured Finance Securities |
Long Term Mutual Fund Schemes |
Long Term Debt Exposure |
Long Term Credit Enhancement Securities |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Highest Degree of Safety | AAA | AAA(SO) | AAAmfS | AAA | AAA(CE) |
2 | High Degree of Safety | AA | AA(SO) | AAmfS | AA | AA(CE) |
3 | Adequate Degree of Safety | A | A(SO) | A mfS | A | A (CE) |
4 | Moderate Degree of Safety | BBB | BBB (SO) | BBBmfS | BBB | BBB (CE) |
5 | Moderate Risk of Default | BB | BB (SO) | BBmfS | BB | BB (CE) |
6 | High Risk of Default | B | B (SO) | BmfS | B | B(CE) |
7 | Very High Likelihood of Default | C | C (SO) | CmfS | C | C (CE) |
8 | In default or expected to be in default | D | D (SO) | DmfS | D | D (CE) |
# | Safety Level | Short Term Securities | Short Term Structured Finance Securities |
Short Term Mutual Fund Schemes |
short Term Debt Exposure |
Short Term Credit Enhancement Securities |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Very Strong Degree of Safety | A1 | A1 (SO) | A1mfs | A1 | A1 (CE) |
2 | Strong Degree of Safety | A2 | A2(SO) | A2mfS | A2 | A2(CE) |
3 | Moderate Degree of Safety | A3 | A3(SO) | A3mfS | A3 | A3(CE) |
4 | Minimal Degree of Safety | A4 | A4(SO) | A4mfS | A4 | A4(CE) |
5 | In default or expected to be in default | D | D(SO) | NA | D | D(CE) |